Home

Featured Articles

Aug 23, 2025
Viren S Doshi

Eradicating the Black Economy in India’s Real Estate Sector - Next Gen Reforms Part 2

Taxation Model for Wealth Creation for Next Level Economic Growth: Commercial and Industrial Properties: Suggestion: Eliminate stamp duty and GST on commercial and industrial property transactions or cap them at a nominal rate (e.g. 0.5 to 1% GST, no stamp duty). Reduce LTCG tax to 5% or preferably less for these properties. Impact: Lower taxes encourage formal transactions, attract investment, and boost commercial real estate demand, projected to grow with 2,100 global capability centres (GCCs) by 2030. Residential Properties: Tax residential properties based on land area and construction size, mirroring municipal property tax structures, to ensure fairness and affordability. Suggestion: Replace flat stamp duty rates with a tiered GST-based system (e.g., 1% for properties below 500 sqm, 2% for 500–1,000 sqm, 3% for above 1,000 sqm). Exempt GST on completed residential properties and reduce LTCG tax to a maximum of 5%. Impact: This would reduce tax evasion, enhance affordability and support initiatives like Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY). Agricultural, Gauchar and Non-Agricultural Land: Given their role in food security, rural livelihoods and development, these land transactions should be minimally taxed or exempted to prevent black money generation and circulation while supporting farmers and development. Suggestion: Include agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land in the unified GST framework with a nominal rate (e.g., 0.5–1%) or provide tax exemptions for small and marginal farmers. Impact: This would encourage formal transactions, reduce unaccounted cash transactions and support rural economies and development projects. Other measures to eliminate the black economy in the real estate sector: Digitisation of Land Records: Digital India Land Records Modernisation Programme (DILRMP) has digitised 95% of village land records, assigning Bhu-Aadhaar to over 9 crore parcels. Urban areas lag, enabling fraud. Suggestion: Accelerate urban land record digitisation, integrate GIS mapping (as in Delhi and Kerala), and link records with PAN and Aadhaar for transaction tracking across all land types, including agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land. Impact: Digitisation ensures transparency, reduces fraudulent transactions and supports price rationalisation. Expanding the Real Estate Regulation Act (RERA): RERA (2016) excludes land transactions, a major black money source. Suggestion: Extend RERA to regulate all land deals (including agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land), mandating registration and transparency, with a national regulator to oversee compliance by the state regulators. Impact: This would reduce benami deals and ensure accountability. Enforcing the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act: Assets worth Rs 1,800 crore, including 621 properties, have been attached for transactions above Rs 30 lakh. Suggestion: Increase scrutiny of high-value land deals, including agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land. Conduct regular audits and impose harsher penalties. Impact: This deters benami ownership and black money parking. Single-Window Clearance System: Decentralised approvals foster corruption and cash bribes. Suggestion: Implement a centralised, time-bound, digital single-window clearance system for real estate and land transactions, including agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land. Impact: This would streamline approvals and reduce unaccounted cash paid as bribes. Public Disclosure of Assets: A 2024 survey showed 67% support for terminating officials who fail to disclose assets. Suggestion: Mandate asset disclosure for officials and their families with strict penalties for lack of compliance. Impact: This deters illicit real estate investments by public officials. Control over Hawala Economy: Any cash or journal “off record” entries from overseas or from within the country generally end up in the black economy pool of real estate. Suggestion: Trails must be examined with this in view for any such FEMA or PMLA violation. Impact: This would help in curbing the black economy in the real estate sector. Price Rationalisation: Black money inflates property prices, reducing affordability. Suggestion: Use digitised records and transparent transactions to monitor prices and force the disinvestment of benami properties. Impact: Lower prices would enhance affordability and reduce black money circulation. 4. Conversion of Agricultural Land to Non-Agricultural Land: Conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural (NA) land involves changing the land’s designated use from agriculture to residential, commercial, industrial or other purposes governed by state-specific land revenue laws (e.g., Land Revenue Codes in Gujarat, Maharashtra). This process is critical due to urbanisation, industrialisation and infrastructure development, but is a hotspot for black money due to high costs and regulatory loopholes. Procedure: Landowners apply to the state’s revenue department or local authorities (e.g., District Collector) for NA status, providing documents like land records, ownership proof and a project plan. Approval involves land surveys, environmental clearances and compliance with zoning regulations. The process varies by state, with timelines ranging from 3 months onwards. Conversion Charges: States levy conversion fees, often based on land value, area or intended use. Gujarat: Conversion fees range from Rs 200–2,000 per hectare, plus a premium based on market value (e.g. 20–40% of land value for residential/industrial use). Maharashtra: Conversion tax is 2–5% of the land’s market value, plus a non-agricultural assessment tax. Uttar Pradesh: Conversion charges vary by district and land use, often 5–10% of market value. Andhra Pradesh: One-time conversion tax is 3% of the land’s market value. Tamil Nadu: Conversion fee is 3% of the market value. Bihar: 10% of the property value. Delhi: Rs 14,000–25,000 per square meter, plus additional Floor Area Ratio (FAR) charges of Rs 3,000–8,000 per square meter in industrial zones. Stamp Duty and LTCG Tax: Post-conversion, NA land transactions attract stamp duty and registration fees, increasing the total costs of lands and projects. Sales of converted land are subject to 12.5% LTCG tax, further incentivising unaccounted cash deals to evade taxes. Black Economy Drivers: Unaccounted Cash Transactions: High conversion fees, stamp duty and LTCG tax encourage under-reporting of land values for conversion and subsequent sales. Corruption in Approvals: The discretionary and complex approval process fosters corruption, with bribes often paid in unaccounted cash to expedite conversions, contributing to black money circulation that again ends up in real estate with resultant hoarding of land. Benami Ownership: Converted land is often held under benami names to avoid taxes. Trends: Increasing Conversions: Rapid urbanisation and infrastructure projects (e.g., highways, smart cities) have driven agricultural land conversions, reducing cropland in peri-urban areas. Gujarat and Maharashtra have seen significant conversions for industrial corridors and Special Economic Zones (SEZs). Policy Reforms: States like Gujarat (e-Dhara system), Karnataka (Bhoomi portal), and Andhra Pradesh (Dharani portal) have streamlined NA conversion through online platforms, reducing delays but not fully eliminating unaccounted cash bribes. Environmental Concerns: Unregulated conversions threaten food security and ecosystems, with agricultural land (60.05% of India’s land area) facing pressure from development. Agricultural to Non-Agricultural Land Conversion Data: Comprehensive national-level data on agricultural to non-agricultural land conversions is limited due to state-specific reporting and varying definitions of land use. However, available studies and government reports provide insights: 2010–2030 Projections: A 2020 study estimates that agricultural land expansion (including conversions to cropland and pasture) will range from 15,605–30,672 km² by 2030, driven by food demand. However, conversions to non-agricultural uses (residential, commercial, industrial) are significant in peri-urban areas, though exact numbers are not uniformly tracked. State-Level Data: Gujarat: Between 2015 and 2020, approximately 1.2 lakh hectares of agricultural land (around 1% of total agricultural land in the state) were converted to non-agricultural use, primarily for industrial and residential purposes, facilitated by the Gujarat Land Revenue Code. Maharashtra: From 2016 to 2021, around 1.5 lakh hectares (1% of total agricultural land) were converted, driven by urban expansion in cities like Mumbai and Pune, and industrial projects like SEZs. Karnataka: The state reported 80,000–1 lakh hectares (1% of total agricultural land) converted annually from 2018 to 2023, with amendments to the Karnataka Land Revenue Act (2022) enabling faster conversions via self-declaration. Uttar Pradesh: Approximately 2 lakh hectares were converted between 2014 and 2020, following amendments to the Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (2014), particularly for real estate and infrastructure projects. Tamil Nadu: Around 50,000 hectares were converted from 2017 to 2022, mainly for residential and commercial development, as per the Tamil Nadu Change of Land Use Rules, 2017. Challenges in Data: The lack of a centralised database and inconsistent reporting (e.g., some states report conversions in hectares, others in square meters) make precise national figures difficult. The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation’s nine-fold land use classification covers 305 million hectares but does not explicitly track conversions. Black Economy Drivers: The high volume of conversions, especially in states like Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra, creates opportunities for a huge black money circulation pool due to high conversion fees, stamp duty and LTCG tax, encouraging under-reporting and unaccounted cash deals. Suggestions: Subsuming Conversion Fees into GST: Include NA conversion fees in the unified GST framework with a low rate (e.g., 1%) to reduce costs and encourage transparency. Digitised Approval Process: Implement a single-window, digital clearance system for NA conversions, integrated with land records, to reduce corruption and unaccounted cash bribes. Centralised Data Tracking: Establish a national database under DILRMP to track agricultural to non-agricultural conversions, ensuring transparency and consistency. Impact: These measures would formalise conversions, reduce black money and support sustainable development while preserving agricultural land for food security. 5. Agricultural, Gauchar and Forest Land: Status and Trends: The status and trends of agricultural, gauchar (pasture) and forest land in India are critical for understanding land use dynamics and their impact on the black economy. Agricultural Land: Status: As of 2021, agricultural land covered over 1.78 million sq. km, accounting for 60.05% of India’s land area, the highest net cropped area globally. It includes arable land, permanent crops and pastures, with 51.09% under cultivation as of 2018. Trends: Cropland expanded from 92 million ha in 1880 to 140.1 million ha by 2010, driven by population growth and food demand. From 2010 to 2030, cropland expansion is projected to be moderate (15,605–30,672 km²) due to agricultural intensification and yield improvements (e.g., wheat yields increased from 0.8 tonnes/ha in 1948 to 6 tonnes/ha by 2000). Pressure on agricultural land persists due to rising food demand (projected at 300 million tonnes by 2025). Black Economy Drivers: Agricultural land transactions, exempt from GST and subject to high stamp duty and LTCG tax, are prone to unaccounted cash transactions and under-reporting. Subsuming stamp duty into GST and reducing LTCG tax can formalise these transactions, reducing black money circulation. Gauchar (Permanent Pastures Grazing Land): Status: Gauchar land, primarily owned by village panchayats or the government, accounted for 3.92% of India’s land area in 2018, with a pasture area of 59,964 km² in 2010. Trends: Demand for pasture land is projected to grow significantly by 2030 (119,823 km² to 152,913 km²), driven by livestock growth. Encroachment for cultivation has reduced grazing land, with stocking density rising from 63 LU/km² in 2010 to 93–148 LU/km² by 2030. Black Economy Drivers: Gauchar land transactions, often informal due to community ownership, are susceptible to unaccounted cash deals. Land acquisition for projects may also be grounds for controversy and bribery at various levels. Forest Land: Status: As of 2023, India’s forest and tree cover spans 827,356.95 km² (25.17% of geographical area), with forest cover at 715,342.61 km² (21.76%) and tree cover at 112,014.34 km² (3.41%). Trends: Forest area decreased from 89 million ha in 1880 to 63 million ha by 2010, but has stabilised since the 1980s due to conservation policies. India ranks third globally for annual net forest cover gain (2010–2020) and aims to restore 26 million ha of degraded land by 2030. Black Economy Drivers: Forest land, under government control, is not prone to black money transactions but faces illegal encroachments. Digitisation and strict enforcement can prevent illicit land use changes and related economic fallouts. 6. Impact of Next-Gen Reforms and Economic Goals: Eradicating black money and reforming taxation support India’s goal of surpassing a $5 trillion economy and achieving “Viksit Bharat” by 2047: Ease of Doing Business: A unified GST framework, digitised land records and a single-window clearance system for real estate and NA conversions would streamline processes, reduce corruption and attract investment (e.g., foreign investments in office spaces tripled to $10.3 billion during 2017–21). Minimal taxation on commercial, industrial and converted NA land would encourage entrepreneurship, fostering a business-friendly environment. Economic Growth: Real estate’s multiplier effect on 300+ allied industries drives GDP growth. Formalising transactions through a unified GST, lower LTCG tax and transparent NA conversions brings taxable income into the formal economy, supporting infrastructure projects like the Rs 1.5 lakh crore interest-free loans to states and the Rs 1 lakh crore Urban Challenge Fund (Budget 2025). Lower taxes on commercial properties and converted NA land would boost investment, job creation and GDP, particularly through GCCs (projected to reach 2,100 by 2030). Housing and Rural Development: High stamp duty, GST, and LTCG tax inflate residential property costs. A municipal-style GST model for residences and lower capex taxes would enhance affordability, supporting PMAY’s target of 2 crore urban and 2.95 crore rural houses. Minimal taxation on agricultural, gauchar, and NA land supports rural economies, ensuring food security and livelihoods for 41.49% of the workforce. Global Competitiveness: A transparent, low-tax real estate sector with a unified GST would attract NRIs and Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), which is projected to create a $19.65 billion opportunity. Lower taxes on commercial properties, agricultural land and converted NA land would enhance India’s appeal for global businesses and sustainable development amid current global order changes. Conclusion The black economy in India’s real estate sector should be eliminated at this critical juncture when the government is mulling over next-gen economic reforms. Political, economic and national will should be displayed by taking certain bold measures. Most of the real estate stakeholders themselves, as well as the consumers and citizens, want to operate legally, avoiding the pitfalls and risks of operating illegally. Some big stakeholders have already been operating completely legally. A handful of “land and estate mafia” can't be allowed to thwart the march of the nation towards Viksit Bharat 2047. Outlined measures for streamlining of real estate sector for ease of doing business would lead to unprecedented GDP growth to achieve India’s $5 trillion economy goal and beyond.

Aug 23, 2025
Viren S Doshi

Eradicating the Black Economy in India’s Real Estate Sector - Next Gen Reforms Part 1

Overview The real estate sector, particularly land transactions, is a significant conduit and repository for black money in India, with estimates suggesting up to 60% of unaccounted wealth invested in this sector. One of the most important reasons for this dreadful situation is the taxation structure of real estate expenses and incomes. High stamp duty on property transactions, high property registration charges, Goods and Services Tax (GST) on certain types of property sales, and income tax (on short-term capital gains), as well as long-term capital gains (LTCG) tax, encourage under-reported deals completed with unaccounted cash payments, perpetuating the black economy. On the other hand, complete GST exemption in land deals is also a ground for the generation of black money, but subsuming applicable stamp duty for such land into the GST system would streamline the deals into the mainstream economy. Here is a detailed analysis of the black economy, real estate taxation structure, state-wise stamp duty details, LTCG tax, measures to eradicate black money, details of agricultural-gauchar-forest land, agricultural to non-agricultural land conversion issues and impact of all these issues on national economic goals. 1. The Black Economy in Real Estate: Scale and Impact: The real estate sector, projected to reach $1 trillion by 2030 and $4.8–7 trillion by 2047, contributes 13–18% to India’s GDP. Its opacity, especially in land deals, needs to be addressed. Drivers of the Real Estate Black Economy: Under-Reporting: Buyers and sellers report lower transaction values to minimise or evade taxes, paying the difference with the actual transaction values in cash (e.g., a Rs 1 crore property registered at Rs 40 lakh, with Rs 60 lakh in cash). Land transactions, exempt from GST, and ancillary services (e.g., brokerage, legal fees) are likely done off record for intermediate dealings and final dealing (between the first owner and the final buyer) is done on record with partial on-record payment; the rest of the payment is done through unaccounted cash transactions. Benami Deals: Properties are registered under proxies to conceal ownership, thereby evading taxes and tax scrutiny of real owners. 2. Real Estate Taxation - Black Economy: Taxation in real estate (including stamp duty, registration charges, GST and income tax for short-term capital gains and LTCG tax) significantly impacts transaction costs, hindering economic growth and contributes to black money generation and circulation. Taxation for the real estate sector must be based on certain objectives. Differentiating between recurrent and capital expenditure and gains is a crucial factor for promoting economic activities for wealth creation and a rise in GDP. Differentiating between a capital transaction that results in making the capital productive and one that makes the capital non-productive is also equally crucial for a highly populated country like India. Differentiating between commercial and industrial properties and residential properties is also crucial because productivity is linked with commercial and industrial properties. To promote entrepreneurship and wealth creation, transactions involving commercial and industrial properties should be minimally taxed or exempted from stamp duty, GST and LTCG tax rather than the usual trend of taxing these properties at higher rates compared to residential properties. Capital, specifically the real estate capital, mostly acts as the foundation for economic activities and such capital formations and capital dealings for productive purposes must be rather encouraged by lowering taxes or by tax exemptions. A capital that doesn't generate economic growth must either become generative or must change hands to be productive to avoid attracting taxes. Idle capital is a non-performing asset. The government should facilitate the change of ownership of idle capital rather than impose taxes hindering the change. If at all, taxes may be imposed on holding and hoarding of idle capital. Land hoarding, as well as land short-selling without any productivity, is a kind of sick practice that sickens the entire economy. Each land parcel in a densely populated nation like ours must generate economic growth in each financial year, else it will be subjected to tax. A transaction that makes capital productive or more productive should be exempted from tax. Recurrent Expenditure and Recurrent Incomes vs. Capital Expenditure (Capex) and Capital Gains from Taxation Viewpoint: Recurrent Expenditure: These are ongoing expenses, such as utility bills, maintenance costs, municipal property taxes, and operational expenses (e.g., salaries, rent for leased properties) and expenses for consumables at all levels. Taxation on recurrent items, like GST, targets consumption, which is justified for revenue generation for the public exchequer. However, high recurrent taxes can reduce consumption and affect the economy adversely. Capital Expenditure (Capex) and Capital Gains: Real estate, including land and building purchases, is a capex, representing long-term investments that drive wealth creation by increasing GDP. High taxes on capex, such as stamp duty (4–8%), GST on under-construction properties (1–12%), together with taxes on capital income in the form of incometax on short term capital gains as well as LTCG tax (12.5% for properties held over 2 years), discourage investment, inflate capital costs, and push transactions into tax evasion and the resultant black economy. Fictitiously recorded capital losses based on indexation calculation, coupled with receipts in unaccounted cash, are also used as a trick to avoid direct taxes in certain cases. High taxes on capex and capital gains, including LTCG tax, deter entrepreneurship and wealth creation, particularly in commercial and industrial real estate. Lowering capex taxes and capital gains taxes on real estate sector dealings would encourage formal investments, boost asset creation, and stimulate economic growth through multiplier effects on 300+ allied industries (e.g., cement, steel) and many other agricultural and allied sectors. A low-tax regime for capex would formalise transactions, reduce black money and align with India’s economic goals. Real estate investments in economically productive properties generate long-term economic benefits, including infrastructure development, job creation and GDP growth. Having outlined the objectives that can be used for policy-making and for action, let us now consider the real estate taxes, one by one. This will be followed by suggestions to eliminate the black economy to augment economic growth. Stamp Duty - Registration Charges: Status Overview: State governments levy stamp duty and registration charges under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and state-specific laws, significantly increasing transaction costs and encouraging under-reporting. State-Wise Stamp Duty Rates (as of 2025, based on available data): Gujarat: 4.9% stamp duty (3.5% stamp duty + 1.4% surcharge) plus 1% registration fee. Gujarat reduced stamp duty in 2020, reportedly boosting compliance and transaction volumes. But before attaining full effects, it rightly revised the circle rates (jantri), dampening the reduction in stamp duty. Maharashtra: 5–6% stamp duty (6% in urban areas like Mumbai, 5% in rural areas) plus 1% registration fee (capped at Rs 30,000). Karnataka: 5% stamp duty for properties above Rs 45 lakh, 3% for Rs 21–45 lakh, 2% for below Rs 20 lakh, plus 1% registration fee. Delhi: 6% stamp duty for men, 4% for women, plus 1% registration fee. Uttar Pradesh: 7% stamp duty plus 1% registration fee (capped at Rs 20,000). Tamil Nadu: 7% stamp duty plus 1% registration fee. Rajasthan: 5% stamp duty (4% for women, 3% for SC/ST), plus 1% registration fee. Punjab: 7% stamp duty (5% for women) plus 1% registration fee. Haryana: 7% stamp duty (5% in urban areas for women) plus 1% registration fee (capped at Rs 15,000). Telangana: 5% stamp duty plus 0.5% registration fee. Andhra Pradesh: 5% stamp duty plus 1% registration fee. West Bengal: 7% stamp duty (6% in rural areas) plus 1% registration fee. Kerala: 8% stamp duty plus 2% registration fee. Madhya Pradesh: 7.5% stamp duty plus 1% registration fee. Bihar: 6% stamp duty plus 2% registration fee. Impact: High stamp duty (e.g., 8% in Kerala, 7% in Tamil Nadu) and registration fees (0.5–2%) inflate transaction costs, encouraging unaccounted cash payments to under-report property values. For example, in Kerala, a Rs 1 crore property incurs Rs 8 lakh stamp duty and Rs 2 lakh registration fee, pushing parties to report lower values. GST on Property Transactions: Status Residential Properties: Under-construction residential properties attract 1% GST (without input tax credit) for affordable housing up to Rs 45 lakh and 60 sqm carpet area in metro cities and 5% GST (without input tax credit) for non-affordable housing. Commercial Properties: 12% GST with input tax credit. Exemptions: Completed properties with an Occupancy Certificate (OC) and land transactions (including agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land) are exempt from GST under Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017. Impact: To avoid 1% GST, sale deeds for affordable residential properties are done below the limit of Rs. 45 lakh. Exemptions for land create loopholes for unaccounted cash transactions, particularly in the land sector, including agricultural land. (Subsuming applicable stamp duty for land deals into the GST system would streamline the deals into the mainstream economy.) Capital Gains Tax: Status LTCG tax on real estate (properties held for over 2 years) is 12.5% without indexation benefits, down from 20% with indexation. This applies to residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land transactions. The tax is levied on the profit (sale price minus purchase price and allowable expenses) when a property is sold after a holding period of at least 24 months. For individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), exemptions are available under Sections 54, 54EC and 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 if gains are reinvested in specified assets (e.g., residential property or bonds). Short-term capital gains tax is applied as per the income tax slabs for capital gains on properties held less than 24 months. Impact: Encourages Unaccounted Cash Transactions: 12.5% LTCG tax, combined with high stamp duty (e.g., 8% in Kerala) and registration charges, significantly increases the tax burden on property sales. For instance, a Rs 1 crore gain on a property sale incurs Rs 12.5 lakh in LTCG tax, prompting sellers to under-report the sale value (e.g., reporting Rs 50 lakh to reduce tax liability) and accept the balance in unaccounted cash, fuelling black money generation and circulation. Benami Transactions: High LTCG tax encourages holding properties under benami proxy names to avoid tax liability entirely, as the true owner can transfer ownership without triggering a taxable event. This is particularly prevalent in high-value land transactions, including agricultural and non-agricultural land. Owners and intermediaries prefer to hold assets as it is, without any productivity, to avoid LTCG tax till the final sale to the final buyer, prolonging on-record holding time. Tax evasion-generated black money is continuously parked in real estate by real estate stakeholders (including land “sharks”), as a store of unaccounted wealth, leading to reduced market liquidity. This results in land hoarding. Removal of indexation benefits in 2024 may have increased the effective tax burden, especially for long-held properties, as inflation is no longer factored into the cost base. This discourages legitimate investors and encourages tax evasion through unaccounted cash deals or benami holdings. On the other hand, the indexation facility was misused to report losses on record while actually siphoning huge gains through unaccounted cash payments. Agricultural land sales by farmers are often exempt from LTCG tax if the land is outside urban limits (as per Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961), but converted non-agricultural land attracts 12.5% LTCG tax. This differentiation encourages under-reporting of conversion status or sales values to claim exemptions, contributing to black money. High LTCG tax stifles real estate market dynamism, reduces formal transactions, and hampers wealth creation, particularly for commercial and industrial properties that drive economic growth. It also discourages reinvestment of gains into productive assets, limiting the sector’s contribution to GDP. The real estate sector’s multiplier effect on 300+ allied industries is constrained when transactions remain informal due to tax avoidance. In states with high property appreciation (e.g., Maharashtra, Delhi), LTCG tax significantly impacts sellers, as gains are larger, increasing the incentive for under-reporting. For example, in Mumbai, where property prices have risen 5–10% annually, a Rs 2 crore gain could incur Rs 25 lakh in LTCG tax, pushing sellers toward unaccounted cash transactions. Small investors and farmers selling agricultural or converted land face a high tax burden, discouraging formal sales. This is particularly acute for farmers converting land for development, as the 12.5% LTCG tax, combined with conversion fees and stamp duty, reduces their net proceeds, encouraging unaccounted cash transactions. 3. Measures to Eradicate the Black Economy in Real Estate: To eliminate black money, particularly in land transactions (including agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land), the following measures address taxation, transparency and enforcement while promoting wealth creation: Subsuming stamp duty into GST: Suggestion: Subsuming stamp duty into GST would create a unified "One Nation, One Indirect Tax" framework, replacing state-specific stamp duties with a standardised GST rate for all real estate transactions, including land, agricultural land, gauchar land and fees for conversions to non-agricultural land can also be subsumed into GST. A low GST rate (e.g., 1) would reduce the tax burden and encourage formal transactions. Benefits: Uniformity: Eliminates varying stamp duty rates across states (e.g., 4.9% in Gujarat vs. 8% in Kerala), simplifying compliance and reducing tax evasion. Transparency: A single GST rate with mandatory digital filing appended along with a registration system formalises transactions, curbing unaccounted cash transactions in real estate, including agricultural land. Revenue Neutrality: States could be compensated through the GST Council, ensuring no revenue loss to the states for an initial fixed period. Ease of Doing Business: A unified tax reduces administrative complexity, attracts investment, and aligns with India’s economic reforms. Challenges: States may resist as stamp duty is a significant revenue source (e.g., Maharashtra collects over Rs 30,000 crore annually). Strong coordination via the GST Council and a phased implementation may be required. Suggestion: Pilot a low GST rate (1%) for real estate transactions, including agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land conversions, in select states, integrating stamp duty, and evaluate its impact on compliance and black money reduction. A unified GST framework formalises the real estate sector, reduces black money, and enhances ease of doing business. Subsuming applicable stamp duty for land deals into the GST system would streamline the deals into the mainstream economy. Strengthening GST Compliance: A 2024 survey showed 90% of citizens support mandatory GST receipts for real estate services. Suggestion: Enforce stricter GST audits for builders, subcontractors and ancillary services. Mandate digital payments for transactions above Rs 50,000, including agricultural, gauchar and non-agricultural land deals. Impact: This would curb unaccounted cash transactions and bring taxable income into the formal economy. Reducing LTCG Tax: Suggestion: Lower LTCG tax to 5 % or preferably still less for commercial, industrial, agricultural, and non-agricultural land. Exemptions for Productive Assets: Exempt LTCG tax for commercial/industrial properties used for entrepreneurial activities, aligning with wealth creation goals. Extend exemptions under Section 54EC to include more productive investment options for reinvesting gains. Digital Reporting: Mandate digital reporting of all real estate sales with Aadhaar and PAN-linked transactions to track LTCG tax compliance and deter under-reporting. Integrate with land record databases like Bhu-Aadhaar for real-time monitoring. Differential Tax Rates: Introduce tiered LTCG tax rates based on property type and use and subsequent use (e.g. 1% for commercial/industrial, 5% for residential, 0% for agricultural land held by farmers), incentivising formal transactions in productive sectors. Impact: Lowering LTCG tax would increase market liquidity, formalise transactions, reduce benami holdings, encourage reinvestment, boost the real estate sector’s contribution to GDP and curb black money circulation. Taxing Unsold Inventory: Builders hoard unsold stock of land and build up properties to inflate prices, often using black money. Suggestion: Tax any income from unsold inventory as “income from house property” uniformly and monitor price manipulation. Impact: This would discourage hoarding and reduce black money-driven inflation in asset pricing.

Historical Bonds and Broken Trusts: The Russia-Ukraine Saga

BRICS Currency and Dedollarisation

Alaska Summit: Putin Gets the Better of Trump

Featured Articles

Eradicating the Black Economy in India’s Real Estate Sector - Next Gen Reforms Part 2

Eradicating the Black Economy in India’s Real Estate Sector - Next Gen Reforms Part 1

Reports View All

55 million US visa holders under review as Trump administration intensifies immigration crackdown

After ‘Maharaj of tariffs’, Trump’s trade advisor calls India, ‘Kremlin’s laundromat’

‘Global context of our meeting is evolving geopolitical situation and shifting trade landscape’: EAM Jaishankar in Moscow

President Xi Jinping visits Tibet to mark 60 years of Chinese rule, says Tibetan Buddhism needs to change

ISRO carried out nearly twice as many missions in 2015-2025 compared to 2005-2015 says Chairman V Narayanan

MEA rejects Nepal’s claim over Lipulekh Pass as Kathmandu protests resumption of India China border trade

Search

Top Authors

Archives

Featured Articles

Reports View All

Search

Podcast / Videos

Popular Posts

Top Authors

Archives